Jump to Navigation

Sweepstakes Law Archives

Facebook New Sweepstakes Rules Restrict Certain Sweepstakes

On behalf of The Lustigman Firm, P.C. on December 16, 2009
Category: Sweepstakes Law
Tags: None
Comments: Leave a comment

Twitter-Based Prize Promotions: Tweeting for Trouble

On behalf of The Lustigman Firm, P.C. on July 9, 2009
Category: Sweepstakes Law
Tags: None
Comments: Leave a comment

FTC Clarifies Position on Forward to a Friend

On behalf of The Lustigman Firm, P.C. on January 5, 2009
Category: Sweepstakes Law
Tags: None
Comments: Leave a comment

California Sweepstakes Bill Modified to Reduce Industry Concerns

On behalf of The Lustigman Firm, P.C. on September 18, 2008
Category: Sweepstakes Law
Tags: None
Comments: Leave a comment

New York Attorney General Settles with H&R Block Regarding Deceptive Advertising Tactics in Sweepstakes Programs

On behalf of The Lustigman Firm, P.C. on July 6, 2008
Category: Sweepstakes Law
Tags: None
Comments: Leave a comment

ABA Practical Lawyer Article Explores Compliance Considerations For User-Generated Content Promotion

On behalf of The Lustigman Firm, P.C. on June 2, 2008
Category: Sweepstakes Law
Tags: None
Comments: Leave a comment

GA SC Holds That Premium Text Message Games Do Not Constitute Gambling

On behalf of The Lustigman Firm, P.C. on April 30, 2008
Category: Sweepstakes Law
Tags: None
Comments: Leave a comment

Update on Sweepstakes and Promotion Challenges

On behalf of The Lustigman Firm, P.C. on April 7, 2008
Category: Sweepstakes Law
Tags: None
Comments: Leave a comment

Update: Oral Argument Takes Place in Georgia Deal or No Deal Qui Tam Lawsuit

On behalf of The Lustigman Firm, P.C. on February 26, 2008
Category: Sweepstakes Law
Tags: None
Comments: Leave a comment

Class Actions Against Premium SMS Sweepstakes Promotions To Go Forward

On behalf of The Lustigman Firm, P.C. on January 3, 2008
Category: Sweepstakes Law
Tags: None
Comments: Leave a comment